What will it take for creationist to realize that the bible is not creditable and reliable evidence? - bible and relaxation
What does it take for a creationist to recognize that the Bible is not admissible and reliable evidence to support his idea that human beings appeared on earth?
Monday, January 4, 2010
Bible And Relaxation What Will It Take For Creationist To Realize That The Bible Is Not Creditable And Reliable Evidence?
7 comments:
Electro Shock Therapy
Electro Shock Therapy
It is a vicious circle.
If you use the Bible as proof, then you do not know the correct definition of the word "test" and not likely to be intellectually capable of examining their own vision of greed. Someone who argues from ignorance, not looking for real answers that are hidden from them.
They suffer too stupid to realize their stupid syndrome.
I think it will take something like logic!
Watch ... Used long time ago, people used to tell important stories, fairy tales and myths. This is what starts the story in Genesis, everything is created on: God created the world and people who were good, but was damaged and lost everything. The whole question of how God created the earth, is not important? I am a Catholic and I do not care whether it says a huge explosion followed by a random process complicated or God: "Pull My Finger," and suddenly everything seemed. It does not matter!
Taking the Bible literally stupid. I mean, there are parts of the drinks the blood and reduces its own members!
I think it will take something like logic!
Watch ... Used long time ago, people used to tell important stories, fairy tales and myths. This is what starts the story in Genesis, everything is created on: God created the world and people who were good, but was damaged and lost everything. The whole question of how God created the earth, is not important? I am a Catholic and I do not care whether it says a huge explosion followed by a random process complicated or God: "Pull My Finger," and suddenly everything seemed. It does not matter!
Taking the Bible literally stupid. I mean, there are parts of the drinks the blood and reduces its own members!
Perhaps, The Bible: Second Edition
Please wait ... King James had written the second edition. Well, given the way he was delivered, we should have no trouble writing a 3rd.
Genesis 1:1
Long frickin ') long (relatively speaking, that there are no devices, and then BAM (or fairy), it was not. It could be God (s) (ESS (s)) done it, but hey, who cares, it was good. Then fcuk up.
There are a number of psychological reasons why some people change their positions with regard to religion can.
There is a free PDF file that goes over them without too much of the dry drilling method of psychoanalysis is available here: Altemeyer http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/ ~ /
Post a Comment